Одну секунду
Что-то сучилось. Попробуйте еще раз.
Black Holes. Wormholes and Entanglement. Einstein. Mysterious islands. And new science that sees how the inside of a black hole is secretly on the outside of a black hole. For even more on how theoretical physicists are trying to solve a decades-old paradox in the field, read: 🤍🤍scientificamerican.com/article/how-the-inside-of-a-black-hole-is-secretly-on-the-outside/
if the black hole has billions of solar mass it is possible to cross it and not die for a while. Let's suppose I cross the EH of such black hole with a pen and paper and I write what I experience behind the horizon. This information was not present before I crossed the horizon and no information can escape from behind the horizon but if in theory information is not lost and is in the hawking radiation, how can my notes written behind the horizon escape the black hole if hawking radiation are not particles from behind the horizon?
Is it possible the Earth came from a Black Hole in the Event Horizon? Scientist have recently discovered a light beam directed at the Earth streaming from the Black Hole. Could this be a wormhole? If we can detect other light beams leaving the Black hole then can we find other plants suitable for human life?
Allah talked to me. youtube.com/results?search_query=%23muhammadqasimdreams #MuhammadQasimDreams
If all matter is effectively made of nothing i.e. atoms are made of 99.99999% nothingness, then what is a black hole in the quantum nothingness of space? Can you have a hole in nothing?
I found this interesting. However, I’m sorry to say I also found the childlike timbre of the narrator’s voice quite off-putting.
this just made me even more confused on the subject
If the information that falls into the black hole is being lost to Hawking radiation, and this creates the black hole information paradox, then how does moving the information loss from one black hole to another via connected to each other through a worm hole solve this problem. To me, that sounds like switch the location of the information paradox, not a solution. Is there something I can missing in my thinking? If so, then I will appreciate any kind explanations. Thank you.
Magnitude is the attribute of magnetism, and magnitude is synonymous with space itself, which is the byproduct of a divergent magnetic field. Nobody can grasp the mechanics of the cosmos without fully understanding the conjugate pair of the dielectric and magnetic, one being the geometry of counterspace, the other the geometry of space; a black hole is merely an object utterly decimated by counterspace. The dielectric has utterly and absolutely dominated magnetism's ability to keep said super-mass "in the visible universe" whereby which we have a super-mass with no magnitudinous presence in the visible realm of ordinary mass.
Schlond
Fantastic!!
Without a solid theory of quantum gravity, it's very speculative to argue that wormholes must exist because (1) general relativity "predicts" them and (2) quantum mechanics says everything that can happen does (occasionally) happen. GR doesn't "predict" wormholes; it's a deterministic theory that allows wormholes. In other words, according to GR, whether wormholes exist depends on the initial conditions of the universe.
I thought the holographic principle put this to bed decades ago by Suskind?
What utter rubbish.
Star Trek DS9 is the best!
Cool stuff!
This means that time and space don't actually exist.
This is huge!
.svg){kind=small}
